home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: mp.cs.niu.edu!not-for-mail
- From: z929171@cs.niu.edu (kim sang woo)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: Borland C++ 5.0 PRICE-E!!!
- Date: 20 Feb 1996 06:41:43 -0600
- Organization: Northern Illinois University
- Message-ID: <4gcfi7$log@mp.cs.niu.edu>
- References: <guzzDM4Gv8.AwI@netcom.com> <4esv0s$cib@news1.usa.pipeline.com> <4fdqt6$r6a@soap.news.pipex.net> <4fe8io$rtn@druid.borland.com> <4fgm7d$2pd@castle.nando.net> <311d53f5.5263386@news.nando.net> <marnoldDMn2x7.1qu@netcom.com> <31202442.1C21@indirect.com> <marnoldDMyvDt.1MA@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: mp.cs.niu.edu
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.2 PL2]
-
- Matt Arnold (marnold@netcom.com) wrote:
- : Bruce Bainbridge <blbainb@indirect.com> writes:
-
- : >It seems Borland has eliminated DOS support. Is this true?
-
- : No.
-
- From developer point of view, BC++ eleminated DOS support long time ago.
- Borland C++ v3.1 out performs BC++ v4.0/4.5 when it comes to targeting
- DOS application. It is true that BC++ still let you target DOS, but it is
- totally useless unless you are developing dos extended application.
-
- I don't care if I don't have IDE for DOS, but I cannot stand it when my
- 15K application takes 50K to run (esp. with DOS, you only have 640K to work with)
-
-
-
-